Federal Budget Operate Plan Model
-
Portfolio
- Excel
Federal Budget Operate Plan, AKA "Spend Plan", "Financial Plan", is the first phase of budget
execution. Below excel-based scenario-driven self-balance spend plan model is a tool to plan and
monitor budget before and during the year of the execution.
Chart 1: Federal Budget Operate Plan Model Demonstration
Chart 2: Federal Budget Operate Plan Model Process Map
Federal Budget Operate Plan TAB "Model" Detail Description by Section
- 1. The scenarios based allocation and execution combinations can produce over 300
outcomes, with pre-built 4 allocation options, 7 non-pay execution, and 11 pay execution scenarios.
- 2. The internal fund decision tools enable agency to conduct trade off analysis, shift
funding priorities, funding new requirements, resolve execution deltas between budget costs and actuals, and
maintain the balance of budget.
- 3. The “external request” portion enable users to adjust increased/decreased baseline
number based on Department and Congress decision.
- 4. “The allocation and execution” provide detail information on execution outcome
based on option selection, internal fund decision, and external adjustment.
- 5. The visualization allow users to gain clear understanding with each scenario
outcome.
Chart 3: Federal Budget Operate Plan Model TAB "Model" Section Description
Federal Budget Operate Plan TAB "Model" Selected Excel Formulas and Functions
- 1: " = IFERROR(VLOOKUP(A10,Factor!AG:AH,2,0),“oops ") "
Formula used in
“Model” to
generate scenarios description based on user selection from
dropdown menu in the section of “Budget Simulation Scenarios”.
- 2: " = -IF(H6="Use N-Pay",(I6-B21)*B20,0)-IF(H7="Use
N-Pay",I7*G21,0)+I14 "
Formula used in “Model” to make adjustments on revised baseline based on the
user
input on “Fund Source” of pay and non-pay and “Amount” on “internal fund decision tool for Pay and for Non-Pay”
- 3: " = IF(H6="Absorbed in Pay",-(I6-B21)*B20/G21,0)+IF(H7="Use
N-Pay",I7,0)-I14/G21+D20 "
Formula used in “Model” to make adjustments on FTE changes based on the user input on “internal fund
decision tool for pay and non-pay”.
- 4: "=IFERROR(SUMIFS(Worksheet!$F:$F,
Worksheet!$D:$D,Model!B24,Worksheet!E:E, Model!$A$10),0) "
Formula used
in “Model” to pull selected data in the section of “Allocation and Execution Scenarios”
Federal Budget Operate Plan TAB "Worksheet" Selected Excel Formulas and
Functions
Formula used in “Worksheet” to retrieve the monthly data based on the user
selection on “Allocation”, “Pay”, and “Non-Pay” dropdown menu.
- 1. "=SUMIFS(Allocation!I:I, Allocation!D:D, Worksheet!D11,Allocation!E:E,
Worksheet!E11, Allocation!B:B, Worksheet!B11) "
- 2. " = VLOOKUP(D26,'Non-Pay Model'!$C:$P,MATCH(Worksheet!E26,'Non-Pay
Model'!$C$1:$P$1,0),0) "
- 3. " = VLOOKUP(D38,'Pay Model'!$A$91:$P$103,MATCH(Worksheet!E38,'Pay
Model'!$A$91:$P$91,0),0) "
Federal Budget Operate Plan TAB "Non-Pay Model" Selected Excel Formulas and
Functions
Use “IF” and “VLOOKUP” combinations to fill out the execution and plan data, if
“VLOOKUP” has positive return from execution data report, then the monthly data field will contain actual
execution data, otherwise, it will show plan data.
- 1.
" = IF(VLOOKUP(C5,'Actual WS'!A:B,2,0)>0,VLOOKUP(C5,'Actual WS'!A:B,2,0),O5) "
Federal Budget Operate Plan TAB "Pay Model" Selected Excel Formulas and
Functions
To calculate FTE QTR distribution by consider the working days by QTR and the FTE
equivalent of the End Strength.
- 1.
" = BU!$B$4/(($D$2/$C$2)+($D$3/$C$3)*(H$3/H$2)+($D$4/$C$4)*(H$4/H$2)+($D$5/$C$5)*(H$5/H$2)) "
Chart 4: Federal Budget Operate Plan TAB "Pay Model"
Chart 5: Federal Budget Operate Plan TAB "Pay Weight"
Budget Allocation Scenarios:
- 1. ALLT-A- 1:1:1:1 - Typical OMB allocation: 25% per QTR.
- 2. ALLT-B- 3:3:3:1 - Accerlated QTR Allocation: 30% per QTR for 1st three QTRs.
- 3. ALLT-C- CR - CR Allocation: pro rata share of prior year agency budget.
- 4. ALLT-D- CR+APPN - Combination of CR ceiling and Appripriation with 1st Half Year
under CR, 2nd under APPN
Non Pay exeuction scenarios are based on customized execution by months with
consideration of historcal data, year to date current execution, and initial plan of execution.
- N1. FY21 Plan - Typical FY spend plan and obligation rate target.
- N2. FY21Plan W Actual - Spend Plan with Actual Update
- N3. His-Median (CR1) - Historical execution rate during CR period.
- N4. His-Min (CR2) - Historical execution rate during CR period with lowest obligation
rate in 1st QTR.
- N5. His-Max (APPN) - Historical execution rate with budget enacted with highest
obligation during 1st QTR.
- N6. His-AVG All - The average rate of all historical exeuction.
- N7. His-WGT CR+APPN - The weighted average of the historical exeuction rate.
Salary and expenses are driven by agency's hiring strategy and budget position, and 11
pay exeuction and hiring scenarios give agency options to find the option to balance its agency budget and working
forces.
- Hire 1 Q1 Hiring Freeze: During hiring freeze, no new hires and lowest payroll cost
in
1st QTR, however, it bring highest ES at YE in order to reach FTE goal.
- Hire 2 Q1 Essential Hire: Hire up to 40% of losses, result in lower payroll costs in
1st QTR.
- Hire 3 Q1 Flat: Hire strategy to only fill current vacant positions, lower payroll
costs in 1st QTR, but higher than average ES on board at YE.
- Hire 4 Bell Grow: Hiring by QTR Ratio 2:3:3:2 will result in moderate 1st QTR cost
and
average ES grow at YE.
- Hire 5 Linear Grow: Linear Growth Hiring Strategy will result in moderate 1st QTR
cost
and average ES grow at YE.
- Hire 6 Log Grow: Logistic Curve Growth Hiring Strategy results in moderate 1st QTR
cost and average ES grow at YE.
- Hire 7 Steady Grow: Hiring by QTR Ratio: 1:1:1:1 will result in moderate 1st QTR cost
and average ES grow at YE.
- Hire 8 Inverted Bell Grow: Hiring by QTR Ratio: 3:2:2:3 will result in moderate 1st
QTR cost and average ES grow at YE.
- Hire 9 All Grow in Q1: Aggressive 1st QTR hiring strategy results highest 1st QTR
payroll costs, relative lower ES at YE.
- Hire 10 FTE = ES: Aggressive 1st QTR hiring strategy results highest 1st QTR payroll
costs, FTE equals ES at YE.
- Hire 11 FTE > ES: Aggressive 1st QTR hiring strategy results highest 1st QTR payroll
costs, ES at YE less than FTE.